Key Elements of Small Learning Communities


Autonomy

  • Separateness
  • Flexible Scheduling
  • Support from Stakeholders
  • Shared Leadership and Decision-Making

Identity

  • Vision/Mission
  • Thematic Focus
  • Self-Selection of Teachers & Students

Personalization

  • Student Involvement
  • Teacher Involvement
  • Parent & Community Involvement

 

Instructional Focus

  • Focus on Student Learning
  • Heterogeneity
  • Professional Development & Collaboration
  • Integrated Curriculum/Teaching Teams
  • Large Repertoire of Instructional Strategies

Accountability

  • Detailed Planning
  • Multiple Forms of Assessment
  • Thorough Implementation
  • Networking with other SLCs


    Autonomy – Smaller learning communities maintain as much control (as reasonable) over space, schedule, budget, curriculum, instruction, and personnel.

    Separateness – Students and teachers within each restructured SLC share unique physical and psychological boundaries.

    Flexible Scheduling – SLCs have the ability to alter the schedule in response to student needs or a desire to create varied learning opportunities.

    Shared Leadership and Decision-Making – Decision-making and leadership are shared among all stakeholders; decisions are based upon school data and current research.

    Strong Effective Leadership – The leaders at the school site and in the community must exercise strong and enlightened leadership to build effective community, teacher, student, business and stakeholder engagement.

    Site Leadership - Principals and all the leaders in the school environment rise to the incredible challenges to authentically include all stakeholders in the planning and implementation of the vision.

    Support from Stakeholders - The change and implementation strategy is developed and owned by the majority of the stakeholder team including the teachers, administrators, counselors, parents, students, employers, college faculty, and other civic and community partners.

    Business, Employer, and Community Involvement – The Business and general community are true partners and support the planning and long-term implementation to ensure both rigor and relevancy for the instruction.

    Stakeholder Awareness - Business and other key community leaders understand SLCs and support the school teams in planning and overcoming the many challenges to successfully transform their schools.

    Employer Engagement as Learning Partners – Employers are involved with the students, teachers, and educators through internships, job shadowing, mentoring, guest teaching, coaching for projects in the classroom, and advising teachers on the applications of academic subjects and career courses/themes.

    Identity – The community of adults and students within each SLC has established goals that drive all decisions and create conditions unique to each SLC.

    Vision/Mission – The community has established goals based on an assessment of students' needs. As a result, each SLC has unique attributes and characteristics, determined by its community, which set it apart from other SLCs.

    Thematic Focus – SLCs are organized around a curricular area, instructional approach, topical area, or any combination of them.

    Self-Selection of Teachers and Students – The identity of each SLC will attract participants based upon their interests. The choices of teachers and students are honored, to the extent possible, while maintaining heterogeneity of groupings.

    Personalization – The smaller learning communities implement strategies that take advantage of downsized environments and facilitate all students being known well.

    Student Involvement – SLCs create opportunities for all students to become involved in their communities, taking advantage of co-curricular and extracurricular activities.

    Teacher Involvement – Teachers follow groups of students for multiple years or teams of teachers share common groups of students in order to know students better and create more personalized learning experiences for them. Examples of such strategies include looping, teaming, teacher led advisories, and mentoring activities.

    Instructional Focus – Each SLC emphasizes the importance of instruction geared toward improved academic achievement for all students.

    Focus on Student Learning – Instruction is geared toward high expectations and improved academic outcomes for all students.

    Contextualized Instruction - Strong integration of both theory and application to ensure students are inspired and engaged in learning.

    Heterogeneity – SLCs establish heterogeneous groupings of students in order to serve all students equally well.

    Professional Development and Collaboration – Professional development is teacher designed, site specific, and aligned with the needs assessment and goals of the SLCs; time is provided for collaboration.

    Integrated Curriculum/Teaching Teams – Traditional subject area boundaries are permeable; curricula may be organized around thematic foci and aligned across grade levels.

    Large Repertoire of Instructional Strategies – Instruction is research-based and tailored to student interests and needs as well as the goals of the SLC.

    Accountability – Students in SLCs demonstrate progress on State, local, and school-wide assessments as well as progress toward established SLC goals, both academic and affective.

    Detailed Planning – Each SLC has engaged in a planning process that involves internal and external stakeholders. The plan is amended based upon ongoing needs assessment and evaluation of student progress.

    Multiple Forms of Assessment – SLCs use assessments that reflect personalized learning, where students demonstrate knowledge and skills; they may involve parents, employers and community.

    Thorough Implementation – The SLCs implement as many of the key elements as possible, as quickly as possible, and at least in accordance with the school wide goals, showing progress toward established SLC goals.

    Networking with Other Small Learning Communities – Staff will connect with other SLCs in order to promote continuous progress.

     

With adaptations, this is derived from Cotton, K. (2001) New small learning communities: Findings from recent literature. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory. Available at www.nwrel.org/scpd/sirs/nslc.pdf

 

[Home] [What Is An SLC?] [Exemplary Practices] [Resources] [In the News] [Calendar] [Newsletter Archive] [Contact Us]

Please contact our Webmaster with questions or comments.
Site Hosted By
www.unitela.com